Tag Archives: Supply Side Economics

2 Cents Worth On Politics, Economics And Life Its Ownself

Today there are stories about a “strong” recovery for our economy with all sorts of anecdotal details.  Interesting that just yesterday the papers were reporting that the official committee that determines these things can’t make up its mind about whether the recession has ended or not.  Do these PhD’s really know that much more than we do?  I personally think its  like pornography and I know it when I see it.

The proposed dramatic cutback in NASA programs may well have lots of unintended consequences if implemented as set out.  Your GPS, your cell phones, your cable TV, international calls, weather predictions and storm warnings and not to mention CIA, NSA and military security resources are all very dependent on satellites orbiting in space.  Do we really want to start depending on Russia, China or even some start up company here to put those into space and just as importantly maintain them over time?  Space exploration and exploitation today really does affect your everyday life in so many ways that you never notice until the system were to break down.  Let’s hope someone who’s an adult takes a second look before a decision is made.  The cutback sure won’t help the job market.  You read they will be offering retraining to the thousands of employees who lose their jobs.  Just what we need a rocket scientist learning to be a mortgage broker.

You need to read the open letter to the guy in the white house from the World Jewish Congress.  It should give pause to anyone concerned about our security.  The questions it raises regarding our current goals and strategy in the Middle East should be answered by the anointed One.  If you believe Israel is a greater threat to our security than Iran then you can ignore it otherwise you might pay heed.

I wonder if anyone could make a profit on a watermelon stand these days during the summer?  I never liked watermelon much even as a child but it was fun to go there with the whole family and pick out your own melon and then everyone gather around the picnic tables they had set up with the salt shakers and old newspapers to cover the table.  Of course it was pretty hot.  The only cooling was from ceiling fans in the pavilion.

Why can’t they financial regulation bill they are discussing in Washington be simple?  Can’t it be done in less than 10 pages.  All it needs to say is that no bank or any other company is too big to fail and that the US government will not be permitted to advance any loans or purchase any equity in such entities.  If they become insolvent they will be forced into a bankruptcy proceeding or liquidated by the FDIC.  What is so complicated about that?  We don’t need any other regulation if the politicians aren’t permitted to “save” vital companies or industries.  We wouldn’t have any more AIG or GM or Citibank  rescues.

I am not a Catholic but hope the Church can straighten out is problems with its pedophile priests.   The first few centuries of the Church didn’t universally require celibacy in the clergy.  The Church has a can do much good in the world but needs to sharpen its recruiting and not become like a union job where it is almost impossible to fire anyone.  Those who don’t measure up need to be cut loose without years of agonizing over the decision.

We’re told Iran can have enough uranium within a year to build a bomb but not to worry because they would need time to test it first.  What if they decide to test in on Tel Aviv?  I mean if they are intent on using it as they say they are, then what would be the downside for them.  If it doesn’t work then no one would know anyway and if it does…… It is always dangerous to not take someone at their word when they make threats. 

Let me get this straight–we are going to tax more, much more and spend more, much, much more to restore economic growth.  Even though everyone agrees we will have deficits over a trillion more or less forever.  And if that doesn’t work then Plan B is to borrow more from foreigners to take the path to prosperity.  Sounds like a great game plan to me. 

China reports a first quarter growth rate of 11.7% which is really remarkable.  It comes from China’s State Council.  You have to wonder about the guy in charge of arriving at that number.  We talk of transparency a lot these days for economic health but opaque is the hue in Chinese reports.  You think the Party sometimes “influences” the numbers one way or the other?  I mean when the big cheese says he hopes that such and such is going to be the number that someone tries to make him happy.  Especially if his dad was in one of those re-education camps of Mao a few years ago.

“That all power is vested in, and consequently derived from, the people; that magistrates are their trustees and servants, and at all times amenable to them.” George Mason, Founding Father.   www.olcranky.wordpress.com

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under business, Culture, Economics, government, Politics

Supply Side Economics From Centuries Ago

With all the bailouts and Stimulus money floating around and the unimaginable amounts of money printed by the Fed being injected into our economy there is renewed debate about the best way to turn our economy around.  Many, especially those in the current administration, tout the idea that we need to keep pouring on the money machine or things would be worse and that only Government, Inc. can lift the economy from its depths.  Of course that is a political view as much as anything sense there are those who love big government and view it as benevolent and further they like the idea of folks being dependent upon government and placing all their faith in government.  Paul Krugman is an advocate of such an approach.   They are completely dedicated to the Keynesian model and method.   That goes well beyond merely deficit spending for a short period.  The government as the engine of growth and prosperity is their long-term goal.   Consolidating command and control of the economy into D. C. is their vision of Nirvana.

Those of this view are already talking about even more stimulus and more government programs to revive the economy.  They have floated the idea of bringing back a WPA type program.   So far all the stimulus money has done the way I see it is to prop up banks and financial institutions that should have been allowed to fail and go out of existence, create even more government jobs, facilitate the takeover of the bulk of the auto industry and make the granting and marketing of mortgages a Federal government program and all the people with mortgages the wards of the State.   Remember that more than 90% of all mortgage loans these days are made directly by the government (FHA, VA, etc) or held by the government (FHLB, Fannie and Freddie).   That can’t be a good thing.   The only growth industry these days is government.  D. C. continues to grow, literally in population and the amount of our national resources that it consumes and the stimulus money has been utilized thus far to primarily attempt to bolster payrolls of other government employees at the State level.   Now the push is on to completely control and regulate the health system, not merely insurance but the delivery of medical services.

Others prefer a so-called supply side approach to fix the current problems and as the best long- term program for expansion of our economy and the continued improvement in the standard of living for the people.  That approach basically calls for less taxation, less regulation and a tax code that offers real monetary incentives for investment into new business ventures large and small.  That was the approach that Reagan brought with him to the White House in 1980.  We had to suffer the pain a bit by squeezing out the inflation and stagflation that had gripped the country for the preceeding decade.    That same philosophy with a few ups and downs was followed by Clinton.  He mostly followed it because the Congress had enough Republicans that they wouldn’t allow tax or budget changes that would gut that supply side approach.  In fairness I believe he also thought it was a pretty good way to foster growth in the economy.  We had remarkable growth and upward mobility throughout the ’80’s and the ’90’s.  It was Clinton’s administration that repealed the Glass-Steagal Act to allow the commercial banks and investment banks to merge into one being and perform the complete gamut of financial services to the populace.  Another day we can discuss the cause of the current problems.  The biggest issue was 9/11 which is mostly forgotten by folks now.  The economist seem to particularly overlook it.  We were shut down and had to respond some way just as we did after Pearl Harbor.  Government mandates about how money could be loaned and who it was loaned to also poured poison into the economic system because so many of those mortgage transactions were not made on sound financial reasoning but to fulfill government edicts.  We reaped what Government, Inc. sowed.

Trying supply side economics is not something really all that new although to listen to some you w0uld think it had never been tried until 1980.  They may know a lot about economics but they sure haven’t studied their history. 

In the mid 5th century the Roman Empire was beginning to crumble. It had already been assailed by Attila and other barbarians and was now permenantly divided into the Eastern and Western Empires.  Things were rather bleak to say the least.  Roman power was diminished but it still had some swagger and the idea of a Roman Empire continued to command respect even if no longer deserved as before.   It was a weakened giant.   In this period one more citizen stepped forward to assume the mantel of the purple and rule as emperor over the Western empire, his name was Majorian.  He probably was the last of strong and decent emperors.  He wrote the Conscript Fathers of the Senate with his pledge to restore Rome.  They were called conscript fathers because it had been viewed for centuries in the Roman world that the nobles had a duty to fulfill toward the Empire.  They were “conscripted” to fill that duty as Senators to give back for the largesse they received as Roman citizens from the Empire.  In those days many of the subject peoples still under the rule of Rome were required to not only pay taxes for mostly local use but also had to pay an annual tribute to Rome for the use of the central government.  Upon taking power he required tax collectors to deal honestly and rooted out corruption and he also forgave the annual tribute payments to Rome from the provinces of Gaul.  The past due tribute was forgiven and the future ones put on hold.  Lo and behold,  the revenues to Rome actually increased.  The people had felt repressed and in despair over the burden imposed by these tribute payments; now they had hope for the future and felt their labors would be rewarded.  The economy thrived for those brief years under Majorian.  Alas, the decay and decadence of past regimes had eroded the foundations of Empire too far and the structure continued its decline.  There really isn’t anything new under the Sun.

“Dictators always look good until the last minutes”  T.  Masaryk   http://www.olcranky.wordpress.com

Leave a comment

Filed under Economics, government, history, Politics, Socialized Medicine